-
1
Feb
- Published by Mr.Digital Cameras in: Digital Slr
- If you like this blog please take a second from your precious time and subscribe to my rss feed!
| Nikon Coolpix P90 12.1MP Digital Camera with 24x Wide Angle Optical Vibration Reduction (VR) Zoom and 3 inch Tilt LCD |
![]() |
Overall Rating: |
| List Price: Varies based on product options |
| Amazon Price: $299.95 |
| Canon PowerShot SD1200IS 10 MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.5-inch LCD (Dark Gray) |
![]() |
Overall Rating: |
| List Price: $179.00 |
| Amazon Price: $114.45 |
| Kodak EasyShare Z981 14MP Digital Camera with Schneider-Kreuznach Variogon 26x Wide Angle Optical Image Stabilized Zoom Lens and 3.0 Inch LCD |
![]() |
Overall Rating: |
| List Price: $329.95 |
| Amazon Price: $329.95 |
| Canon PowerShot SD780IS12.1 MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.5-inch LCD (Black) |
![]() |
Overall Rating: |
| List Price: $229.00 |
| Amazon Price: $198.00 |
| Canon PowerShot SD1200IS 10 MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.5-inch LCD (Blue) |
![]() |
Overall Rating: |
| List Price: $179.00 |
| Amazon Price: $147.99 |
| Canon Digital Rebel XSi 12.2 MP Digital SLR Camera with EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens (Black) |
![]() |
Overall Rating: |
| List Price: $649.99 |
| Amazon Price: Too low to display |
| Nikon D3000 10.2MP Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S DX VR Nikkor Zoom Lens |
![]() |
Overall Rating: |
| List Price: Varies based on product options |
| Amazon Price: $399.99 |
| Canon Rebel XS 10.1MP Digital SLR Camera with EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens (Black) |
![]() |
Overall Rating: |
| List Price: $669.99 |
| Amazon Price: $497.53 |
| Nikon D90 DX 12.3MP Digital SLR Camera with 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED AF-S VR DX Nikkor Zoom Lens |
![]() |
Overall Rating: |
| List Price: Varies based on product options |
| Amazon Price: Too low to display |
| Joby GP3 Gorillapod SLR-Zoom Flexible Tripod for Digital SLR Cameras |
![]() |
Overall Rating: |
| List Price: $54.95 |
| Amazon Price: Too low to display |
2 Responses to “Tamrac 3320 Aero Zoom 20 Case”
Fits my new Panasonic camera great. Helped keep it dry when we got splashed while on a motor boat. Rugged yet easy to use. Two small pockets on either side for small accessories.
Rating: 4 / 5
The upside: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 fits perfectly into this bag (lens hood not attached). The bag adds minimally to the dimensions of the camera. You can put the hood with the hood adapter upside down on the bottom of the bag and the camera still fits in perfectly (the camera lens goes into the wide side of the hood).
I’m giving the exact dimensions of FZ28 to help you judge if this bag would be good for your particular camera: the length is 4. 25″ including the lens cap and the viewfinder eyepiece (the latter protrudes 3/8″ behind the back wall of the camera); the width is 4. 5″ (not including the tiny strap eyelets); the height is 3″ almost exactly.
The downsides: Side pockets are too tight to hold almost anything except for a SD card in a tiny protective case it usually comes in. I think it’s a design flaw. The FZ28 battery measuring 1. 75″x1. 375″x0. 75″ fits in a pocket only with certain effort and since the pocket is too tight it bulges inside the bag. As a result, the camera already would not fit in as comfortably (especially with the hood inside). Besides, you would not be able to take the battery out of the pocket while the camera is in the bag. Of course there is no room for a charger and other accessories.
The shoulder strap has no padding and is made out of rather coarse woven nylon. When you wear the bag on your shoulder make sure it does not rub against your skin – it might irritate or chafe it.
Tamrac has a compatibility chart where one can find recommended Tamrac bags for most of popular digital cameras. I could not put the URL here, but go to tamrac site and you’ll easily find the “Digital Camera Fit Chart”. Ironically, 33xx (Aero Zoom) series bags are not listed there (may be because they are “new”).
Rating: 4 / 5
Leave a Reply